Legal Opinion

David S. v. Jared H.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2013No. 6808 S-14816PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court granted a grandfather and grandmother's petition to adopt their grandchild without the consent of the biological father. The superior court found that the father's consent was not required because he failed significantly without justifiable cause to communicate meaningfully with the child for a period of at least one year. On appeal, the father does not challenge the superior court's finding that he failed to communicate meaningfully with the child for at least the year-long period; he instead argues that this failure was justified by:…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Timothy Wolf ChildCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re Adoption of S.F., a MinorAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. M.M., through his next friend Erin Kirkland v. State of Alaska, Department of Administration, Office of Public Advocacy, Leslie Ridle, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Administration, and Chad Holt, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Public AdvocacyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Ebert v. Bruce L.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API