Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1999No. 03S01-9803-CR-00029PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, J.

The question presented for our determination is: What are the factors which should guide the determination of the consequences that flow from the State’s loss or destruction of evidence which the accused contends would be exculpatory? The State urges that we adopt the bad faith analysis announced in Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988). 1 Two reasons prompt us to reject this analysis: (1) we find, under the circumstances, that the due process principles of the Tennessee Constitution are broader than those enunciated in the United States…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. State v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GilleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Tommy Nunley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State of Tennessee v. Angela M. MerrimanTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API