Legal Opinion
Hochhalter v. Dakota Race Management
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1994No. Civ. 940050PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
Dakota Race Management (DRM) has appealed a district court judgment in favor of Clinton Hochhalter for DRM’s allocated share of the amount of money Hochhalter would have won if he had been issued the ticket he requested when betting on a parimutuel horse race. We reverse.
I
DRM provides electronic simulcast racing services to James River Aerie # 2337 (Jamestown Eagles) and other operators conducting off-track parimutuel betting on horse races viewed on television at the simulcast site. DRM provides the computer terminals for taking bets at the simulcast site and trains the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holberg v. Westchester Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- In the Interest of B.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Oregon Racing Commission v. Multnomah Kennel ClubOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Hochberg v. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Allano v. Westchester Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyer v. HawkinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Ryan v. NEW JERSEY RACING COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Meyer v. HawkinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. McHughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001