Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Hawkinson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2001No. 20000093PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clyde and Dorothy Meyer appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Donald M. and Marilyn F. Hawkinson, dismissing Meyers’ claim for enforcement of an alleged contract to share proceeds of the Western Canadian Lottery. The district court found there was a genuine issue as to the existence of a contract between the parties, but granted summary judgment because the alleged contract had an unlawful object and would be unenforceable as contrary to North Dakota’s public policy against gambling. We hold the public policy of the state of North Dakota would…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Trinity Medical Center, Inc. v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VandermeerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Murphy v. RossowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. East Central Water District v. City of Grand Forks, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. East Central Water District v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Kovarik v. KovarikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API