Legal Opinion

Beecham v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1908No. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

The bill charges the infringement of the trade-mark “Beecham’s Pills.” The proof shows that the defendant has deliberately appropriated the name “Beecham’s Pills.” If the complainant is entitled to enforce his rights in a court of equity, the defendant should be restrained.

But it is urged that .the complainant cannot be heard to complain of the defendant’s misconduct because his own hands are not clean — that his packages bear such misstatements of important facts as to bar him from relief in equity. The defendant claims: (1) That the complainant falsely states that his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Holzapfel's Compositions Co. v. Rahtjen's American Composition Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Oliphant v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. BeechamSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Riggs v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Edward & John Burke, Ltd. v. BishopDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API