Edward & John Burke, Ltd. v. Bishop
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by Edward & John Burke, Limited, against Isaac C. Bishop, to restrain alleged unfair competition in trade in the sale of-Guinness’ Stout in bottles bearing capsules and labels in a collocation' so like the style and dress of complainant’s bottles as to be likely to deceive purchasers.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The complainant is, and at the time of the commencement of this suit was, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and for many years lias had, and now has, a place of business in the city of New York, IJ. S. A. Its business is that of export bottlers of stout, ales, whiskies, and other goods. It is the successor in business of the firm of Edward & John Burke, composed of Edward Burke, John Burke, and John Gardner Nutting. In 1870 that firm was the sole export bottlers for the United States of the stout brewed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- City of Carlsbad v. KutnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- Clark Thread Co. v. ArmitageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
- Dr. Peter H. Fahrney & Sons Co. v. RuminerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. H. P. Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Seaboard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Fruit Industries v. Bisceglia Bros. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Fruit Industries v. Bisceglia Bros. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.