Legal Opinion

Gansvoort Apartments, Inc. v. Droutman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion of plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The court is of opinion and declares that paragraph 30 of the lease is no longer valid, effective and binding upon the parties thereto and is not applicable to the defendant’s present occupancy of the space described. This provision read's *873as follows: “ 30. The landlord agrees that there will be no other apartment in the building leased to a general medical practitioner for professional purposes.”

The defendant’s lease has expired and he is now in possession and occupancy as a statutory tenant. While his possession and occupancy of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. 50 Broad Street, Inc. v. KnoblochAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
  2. Rappaport v. Raylen Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API