Legal Opinion
Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Walter Reade, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
Defendant’s counsel in submitting opposition papers, upon this motion, has followed what I believe to be an inherently unsound practice of mingling in his affidavit alleged facts, comment, inference, argument and explanation. Judge John R. Brown in Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc., 255 F.2d 342, 349-350 (5 Cir. 1958) states that he doubted if the disposition of a case on summary judgment (in that instance, a patent ease) “is furthered by counsel being the personal vehicle by which the ‘undisputed’ facts are put before the Court.” He went on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Zampos v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Co. Anderson v. United States Smelting, Refining and Mining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- The American Securit Company, a Corporation v. Hamilton Glass Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- The Mercantile National Bank At Dallas v. The Franklin Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Porter v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pfeil v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- McGlone v. Contract Callers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pfeil v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission v. Medical Billers Network, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.