Legal Opinion

Coghill v. Badger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1982No. 2-379A51PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

We use this opportunity to expand upon our determination that plaintiff-appellant Alma Jean Coghill (Coghill) had failed to raise a legitimate claim of estoppel or waiver in the notice requirement context.

One of the conclusions reached by the majority opinion in this case, which appears at 418 N.E.2d 1201, (Ind.App.) was that a governmental unit can waive or be estopped to assert an individual tort claimant’s failure to comply with the notice-of-claim requirement of IC 34^4-16.5-7, -9, and -11 by (1) engaging in conduct which indicates that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jameson v. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Jennie Bsharah v. Eltra Corporation and International Union, UawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Delaware County v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. PlonskiIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Interstate Auction, Inc. v. Central National Insurance, Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Celina Mutual Insurance v. ForisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API