Legal Opinion

Becker v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1985No. C5-85-515PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The trial court rescinded the revocation of respondent Scott Becker’s driver’s license on the basis that there was no probable cause that Becker was the driver of the vehicle. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

On December 1, 1984, Officer Peter Kis-ling (Kisling) arrested respondent Scott Becker (Becker) for the crime of driving while under the influence of alcohol. Becker refused testing. Pursuant to the implied consent statute, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984), Becker’s driving privileges were revoked. Becker initiated this action for judicial review…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Roberts v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Berry v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beniek v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Engebretson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API