Legal Opinion

Golder v. Golder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1918No. 21,315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Osage district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to set aside a deed to a farm on the ground thát at the time of its execution the plaintiff was mentally incompetent, and that the deed was procured through the undue influence of the grantee. The defendant, William L. Golder, prevailed.

The errors assigned are that the judgment was contrary to the evidence,' and that the testimony of the grantee should not have been admitted.

*487Touching the first of. these propositions, it cannot he said that the judgment was not sustained by the evidence. Most of the evidence was in the form…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Rice v. WaddillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Thomas v. IrvinTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hale & Bro. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Little v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. CalvertWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Toelle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API