Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This Memorandum addresses the Renewed Motion of Ecogen Inc., Dr. Leigh English, and Dr. Bruce Carlton to Quash Subpoenas and for a Protective Order.1 Mycogen Plant Science, Inc., and Agrigenetics, Inc. (collectively “Mycogen”), are pursuing a patent infringement claim against Monsanto Co. in federal court in California, and it believes *624that Ecogen has information relevant to that claim.
After our review of the extensive briefing, Mycogen has persuaded us that Ecogen should produce some, but by no means all, of the information that Mycogen seeks.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Hayman Cash Register Co. v. SarokinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Smith v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- JZ Buckingham Investments LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- McCabe v. Ernst & Young, LLPDistrict Court, D. New York · 2004
- BRETTER v. PEYTONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.