Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Hanson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1953No. 32208PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Emil Hanson, sixteen years of age, arranged to purchase a pickup truck from Byron Cook. His father was required to cosign a note for the purchase price and a chattel mortgage.to secure the payment thereof.

Cook, the seller, had a policy of public liability insurance on the truck at the time of the sale. The agent of the insurance company, learning of the sale, approached the father, while he was transacting business with a customer in his tailor shop, and solicited the transfer of the Cook policy to the father, and assumed all of the facts pertinent to such a transfer. He knew his company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. ArrigoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. Mid-States Insurance v. BrandonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. Trudeau v. Pacific States Box & Basket Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Pauli v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Davis v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Butter & Dairy Cooperative v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation v. Margy Herman, Mark Lowell Herman, and Leo NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Hall v. WestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company v. Ezra LantaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Burt v. HeikkalaWashington Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API