Legal Opinion
People v. Rolston
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1971No. Docket 5317PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, P. J.
The defendant, Robert Rolston, and Larry Markham were convicted of kidnapping by a jury.1 Markham’s conviction was affirmed by our Court upon a separate appeal.2 This is Rolston’s appeal; he raises a number of issues, but our disposition makes it unnecessary for us to consider all of them.
*203I.
He contends, firstly, that the evidence presented at his preliminary examination was insufficient to support a finding of probable cause and that he should not have been bound over for trial.3
The people’s evidence showed that the victim, Mrs. Kathleen Riddell, a trusted and responsible employee of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- People v. RolstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Younie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Markham v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.