Legal Opinion

Adelman v. Gantt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 2016No. COA16-339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*372 Where there was competent evidence sufficient to establish each element of plaintiff's easement claims introduced at trial, we affirm. Where the trial court's description of the easement was not ambiguous, the trial court correctly denied defendant's motion for a new trial or supplemental proceedings, and we affirm.

*373 Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Adelman owns real property located at 1904 Harrill Street in Charlotte, North Carolina known as Lot 18. Defendant Leroy Gantt owns an adjoining lot, Lot 1, at 1900 Harrill Street. Lots 1 and 18 were previously owned by a common owner, James and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Bonaparte'S Retreat Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Lester v. GalambosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Cape Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. S. Destiny, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  4. Farmers & Merchs. Bank v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API