Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 4, 1926No. 11,414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The district court affirmed the commission’s second award which increased the allowance from 139 to 208 weeks. We think the commission and the court were right. The material facts are that on March 5, 1923, Duran, by accident in the' course of his employment, lost his arm two inches above the elbow; the commission awarded compensation for 208 weeks, and plaintiffs in error claim it should have been 139 weeks.

Compiled Laws, § 4447, which governs the case, specifies compensation for “loss of one arm between elbow and shoulder, 208 weeks; loss of forearm between wrist and elbow, 139 weeks * * *.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Industrial Commission v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API