Bryant Paper Co. v. Holden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
The petition is denied. We deal here only with point IV thereof, which is that the opinion is contrary to the decisions of the Supreme Court in the eases of United States v. Factors & Finance Co., 288 U. S. 89, 53 S. Ct. 287, 77 L. Ed. 633, and United States v. Memphis Oil Co., 288 U. S. 62, 53 S. Ct. 278, 77 L. Ed. 619, both decided January 9, 1933. We cannot yield to this insistence. In each of these cases a general timely, claim for refund was followed by a specific amendment relative thereto and explanatory thereof tendered after the expiration of the statutory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Valley Ice & Fuel Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. HelburnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Bergford v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Acme Steel Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.