Legal Opinion

Acme Steel Co. v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided April 28, 2003No. 7885-94UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

P was the common parent of an affiliated group that was restructured in 1986. In 1986, pursuant to the restructuring plan, P formed a subsidiary, I. Following the formation of I, P became a subsidiary of I through an inversion.

Read the full summary

P was the common parent of an affiliated group that was restructured in 1986. In 1986, pursuant to the restructuring plan, P formed a subsidiary, I. Following the formation of I, P became a subsidiary of I through an inversion. I then distributed, pro rata to its shareholders in a spinoff, all the issued and outstanding common shares of P, which continued to hold all the shares of one pre-existing subsidiary of P. Following the restructuring and spinoff, P filed a consolidated Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, for a 27-week 1986 tax year claiming a consolidated net operating loss…

1Opinion of the Court

ACME STEEL COMPANY (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTERLAKE, INC., AND NOW KNOWN AS ACME METALS, INC.) AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Acme Steel Co. v. Comm'r

No. 7885-94

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2003-118; 2003 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 121; 85 T.C.M. (CCH) 1208;

April 28, 2003, Filed

Interlake Corp. v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 103, 1999 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 10 (1999)

Respondent's motion for entry of decision will be granted, and decision will be entered in accordance with the parties' stipulation of settled issues.

P was the common parent of an…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  5. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Rehabilitation of Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API