Dailey v. Aspen Democrat Publishing Co.

Prom the printed abstract of record we are hardly able to ascertain the facts constituting this, controversy. The insufficiency of that instrument *146can be partially appreciated by quoting from the additional brief of appellant filed by Messrs. Mullins, Waldron & Smith, now of counsel, in which they say: “All we have endeavored to do in this argument is to reach a definite state of facts, if such could be possible, under the record filed in this cause.”

Appellant has certainly failed to comply with Rules 14 and 17 of this court, and the appeal might properly be disposed of thereunder without…