Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Geary

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1909No. 5982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court—Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

By rule 14 of this court it is provided, among other things, that an appellant or plaintiff in error *130shall prepare and file a printed abstract of the record, which must contain a brief statement of the contents of each pleading and set forth fully the points relied upon for the reversal of the judgment, and if in this respect the abstract is defective, the appeal or writ of error may be dismissed.

The errors assigned are that the court erred: (1) in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint; (2) in dismissing the plaintiff’s suit; (3) in not overruling defendants’ demurrer; (4) and, in entering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DeWeese-Dye Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Brennan Mercantile Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shotkin v. KaplanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Zall Jewelry Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Dailey v. Aspen Democrat Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. McPhail v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API