Legal Opinion

In re Perrine

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1940No. 4310PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

After two petitions for reconsideration of the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims here in controversy, the appellant has appealed to this court. Three claims were allowed and the appeal here relates to claims 22, 23, 25, 27 to 29, inclusive, and 31 to 33, inclusive. Claim 22 is illustrative of the appealed claims and reads:

22. In an Internal combustion engine, a carburetor, a valve for regulating the passage of combustible mixture from the carburetor to the engine, and means for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Electric Co. v. Nitro Tungsten Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re FleissnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Application of Hans FleissnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. In re CrosbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Application of Hans FleissnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. In re BlairCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API