Legal Opinion

In re Fleissner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1959No. 6401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

This-appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-10 of appellant’s application for patent for improvements in a “Sieve Drum Drying Machine.” Counsel for appellant withdrew the appeal as to claim 10 at the oral argument and the appeal accordingly is dismissed as to that claim.

*832Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows:

7. A drying machine for drying fibre material, fabrics and the like, comprising a drying chamber, two groups of sieve drums arranged the one above the other and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re PerrineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  2. Application of HeltzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In re AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re AoyamaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Application of Leonard EdgeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. In Re AoyamaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API