Legal Opinion

In re Blair

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1944No. 4866Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Acting Presiding Judge

Claims 24 and 25 having been allowed by the tribunals of the United States Patent Office in appellant’s application for a patent, the Primary Examiner rejected claims 2, 8, 20, 21, 22, and'23 thereof, and appeal has been taken here from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming that of the examiner.

Appellant’s application relates to luminous discharge lamps, which appellant states are intended for use in connection with photographic enlargers and projectors. The lamp comprises a hermetically sealed *1021container, having as one of its walls a preferably flat glass plate coated with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PerrineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API