Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Fire Fighters, Local No. 1 v. Yablonsky

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Before the Court are the respondents’ preliminary objections to the Second Amended Complaint filed by the Pittsburgh Fire Fighters, Local No. 1 (Fire Fighters).

Before addressing the preliminary objections we present the following factual and procedural background. On November 7, 2003, Mayor Murphy filed a request with the Secretary of the Department of Community and Economic Development seeking a determination that the City of Pittsburgh is financially distressed under the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act (Act 47), Act of July 10, 1987, P.L. 246, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkinsburg Police Officers Ass'n ex rel. Harder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 v. YablonskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 19 v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PITTSBURGH FIRE FIGHTERS EX REL., KING v. YablonskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Borough of Greenville v. International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1976Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Borough of Greenville v. International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1976Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API