Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 v. Yablonsky
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
The defendants in this action have filed preliminary objections to the second amended complaint filed by the Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge, No.l (FOP). The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that the Pittsburgh Recovery Plan (Plan), developed pursuant to the Municipalities Financial Recovery Act (Act 47), Act of July 10, 1987, P.L. 246, as amended, 53 P.S. §§ 11701.101— 11701.501, is invalid under the State Adverse Interest Act (SAIA), Act of July 19, 1957, P.L. 1017, as amended, 71 P.S. § 776.1 — 776.8, and alternatively seeks judgment that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilkinsburg Police Officers Ass'n ex rel. Harder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Cherry v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- City of Farrell v. Fraternal Order of PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- City of Scranton v. Firefighters Local Union No. 60Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- City of Scranton v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- City of Scranton v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2 of the Fraternal Order of PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- PITTSBURGH FIRE FIGHTERS EX REL., KING v. YablonskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.