Legal Opinion
Stanley Works v. Kain
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 20, 1993No. Case 3:93-CV-515 (JAC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Chief Judge:
This action arises under the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. (“1934 Act”), and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (“Rule 10b-5”). Pending before the court is the defendants’ Motion for Transfer of Venue (filed May 10, 1993).
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, The Stanley Works (“Stanley”), is a Connecticut corporation with its headquarters in New Britain, Connecticut, and the six individual defendants are all residents of California. The defendants sold to the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. And Yellowbill Finance Limited v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Electronics Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Steinberg & Lyman v. TakacsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Clisham Management, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. AsensioDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Sovereign Bank, F.S.B. v. Rochester Community Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Adams v. Time WarnerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Odell Simms & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998