Legal Opinion

Adams v. Time Warner

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 19, 1999No. 3:98CV1045(WWE)Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, Anthony Adams (“Adams”), commenced this action alleging causes of action arising out of the termination of his employment. Specifically, the complaint alleges, inter alia, that defendant Time Warner Cable (“Time Warner”), wrongfully discharged the plaintiff in violation of Conn.Gen.Stat. 53a section 160 because he refused to participate in a conspiracy to accept bribes for favorable air time contracts with Adam Wex1, Fred Dressier and defendants Guthy-Renker Corporation (“GRC”) and Guthy-Renker Television…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
Frank Sinatra v. National Enquirer, Inc., and Clinic La Prairie, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.