Legal Opinion

State v. Guilliot

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 2001No. 25686-0-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Edmund Guilliot sought to present a diminished capacity defense against a first degree premeditated murder charge for killing his fiancée. He claimed that he had a personality disorder that interfered with his ability to self-medicate his diabetes, which in turn led to hypoglycemia, which in turn caused mental impairment. After ruling that Guilliot had not laid an adequate foundation, the trial court excluded evidence of Guilliot’s personality disorder and his expert’s opinion on Guilliot’s ability to form the intent to kill and to premeditate. Guilliot challenges these rulings along with the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez-OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API