Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 18, 2004No. 52174-8-IPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

To be admissible, an expert’s opinion on diminished capacity must be helpful to the trier of fact in assessing the defendant’s mental state at the time of the crime. An expert does not have to testify with reasonable medical certainty that the mental disorder actually caused diminished capacity at the time of the crime, but the expert must be able to testify based on reasonable medical certainty that the defendant suffers from a mental disorder that impairs the defendant’s ability to form the requisite intent to commit the crime. In this case, the expert witness would testify that it was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. RehakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. Virginia WardenWashington Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State Of Washington v. Darrell D. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State v. GinnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API