Legal Opinion

United States v. Britt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 2, 1983No. ACM 23885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Whether the military judge erred by admitting improper rebuttal evidence during sentencing is the issue facing us. Finding no error, we affirm.

The accused was convicted, in accordance with his pleas, of divers drug involvements with marijuana and cocaine, in violation of Article 134, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 934. His sentence, as approved, is a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for five years, total forfeitures, and reduction to airman basic. One previous conviction, also involving drugs, was considered.

During his trial, the accused made an unsworn…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BlauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. VolmarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. GambiniUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  5. United States v. BoyceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PrivetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. WillisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. CampbellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API