Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1943No. 31476PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries resulting from being struck by a street car of defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the trial court sustained a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s cause of action. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

The accident occurred at Sixty-second and Maple streets in Omaha. Sixty-second street runs south from Maple street so that the two streets form a T at that point with . buildings built along the north side of the T on Maple street.

Maple street is 60 feet in width at that point, and is level for a block or more to the west. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eggeling v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Belik v. WarsockiNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. McClelland v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Folken v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Travinsky v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Callahan v. PrewittNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Roby v. AukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Corbitt v. Omaha Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Johnson v. GriepenstrohNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bush v. JamesNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API