Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Priest

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided July 30, 1999No. Civil 98-2163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAWSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by separate defendants, Sharon Priest and Mike Huckabee (document #26), and the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint a second time (document #28). For the reasons set out within this opinion, the motion to dismiss will be granted and each of plaintiffs’ claims against all defendants, including those against separate defendant Doris Tate, will be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend will be denied.

The amended complaint was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bernbeck v. GaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
  3. Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API