Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gallivan v. Walker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2002No. 20020545Published

1DissentThorne, Judge

198 I respectfully dissent from both the conclusion that section 20A-7-201(2)(a)@®M) creates an unconstitutional abridgement of the Utah Constitution and from the analysis that equates the initiative right with the right to vote, thereby establishing the "initiative right" as one of the relatively few fundamental rights.

199 First, Petitioners have presented this court with a facial challenge to the use of any non-population based geographic distribution requirement in the initiative process. To succeed, Petitioners must demonstrate that no circumstances exist under which such requirement can…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API