Grimes v. GRIMES
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellees (hereinafter “judgment creditors”) confessed judgment on a note against appellants (hereinafter “judgment debtors”) in the amount of $12,190.00. This amount, we must assume, consisted of the principal appearing on the face of the note (less credits), interest unpaid as of the date of confession, and attorney’s commission. Although the note did not contain an acceleration clause, we must assume on this appeal that the note permitted entry of judgment in this amount since an attack on the judgment was never made. See, e.g., Pacific Lumber Co. v. Rodd, 287 Pa.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hoffman Lumber Co. v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Shapiro v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Carnegie v. KeislingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Delaware Valley Factors, Inc. v. G. B. Echenhofer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Western Flour Co. v. AlosiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N v. KeislingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Farmers Trust Co. v. Murray, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Snyder County1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.