Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Riley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1998No. 416 Harrisburg 1997PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Following a non-jury trial, Appellant Louis Riley was convicted of possession with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellant received concurrent sentences of twenty-one to forty-two months imprisonment for possession with intent to deliver, and six to twelve months imprisonment for possession of drug paraphernalia. This appeal followed. We affirm.

Appellant’s sole issue is whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress evidence. In reviewing the ruling of a suppression court, an appellate court must first ascertain whether the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. CottmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. KorenkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API