Legal Opinion

Pauline v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-1788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff John Pauline brings professional malpractice, survival and wrongful death claims against the United States and the Armed Forces Retirement Home (“AFRH”) (collectively, the federal defendants), Dr. Pearson Sunderland, the Professional Services of America (“PSA”), and Viola Johnson-Robinson. 1 The defendants move for summary judgment on all of Pauline’s claims arguing that Pauline’s experts failed to identify a national standard of care and show that national authorities support their proposed national standard of care.

For a medical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Varner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Hill v. Medlantic Health Care GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Liser v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Nwaneri v. SandidgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walen v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API