Legal Opinion

Herzog v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1960No. 8939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

This action was originally commenced on February 15, 1960, by respondents against defendant, City of Pocatello, in which respondents contend that defendant city acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to grant respondents permission to use their property for service station purposes. Respondents allege in their complaint that their petition to use their property for such use has been approved by the zoning commission and planning commission of said city and that the action of the city in denying respondents such right deprives them of a valuable property right.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pittock v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kerley v. WetherellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. North Poudre Irrigation Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. McKelvey v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loveless v. YantisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Workman Family Partnership v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Roosevelt v. Beau Monde Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Caran v. FredaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Gaige v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API