Bogle v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Allen District Court. Bogle brings here for review certain orders made by the district court at the January Term, 1885, in a replevin action wherein Bogle was plaintiff and Bloom was defendant. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*513The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
An application was made to the district court of Allen county to quash an execution issued from that court. The execution was based on a judgment in a replevin action, wherein A. C. Bogle was plaintiff and Samuel Bloom was defendant. It was rendered on January 9, 1885, in favor of the defendant for a return of the property in controversy; or, in case a return could not be had, a recovery of its value, which was found to be one hundred dollars, together with the costs, taxed at $54.15. On January 26,1885, H. W. Talcott, an attorney for…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Otis Bros. & Co. v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Barnett v. BohannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Carrigg v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. RiersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- National Realty Sales Co. v. EwingUtah Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.