Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 2004No. Nos. 03-30018, 03-30054, 03-30063, 03-30055, 03-30062, 03-30056, 03-30060, 03-30057, 03-30061; D.C. Nos. CR-00-00539-KI-04, CR-00-00539-2-KI, CR-00-00539-7-KI, CR-00-00539-3-KI, CR-00-00539-1-KIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
In this consolidated appeal from a joint criminal trial, defendants Anderson, Richard Flowers, Dorothy Flowers, Weakley, and Kirkham all raise challenges to convictions for conspiracy to defraud the government under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Richard Flowers also challenges his conviction for willful failure to file a tax return under 26 U.S.C. § 7203, and Kirkham and Anderson challenge their convictions for tax evasion under 26 U.S.C. § 7201. In addition, Richard Flowers and Dorothy Flowers challenge the district court’s calculation of tax loss for sentencing purposes.- The government has…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Alexander E. MarabellesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Roy G. Powell Dixie Lee PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Richard Joseph FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson, AKA Nelson, AKA West, AKA Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kirkham, AKA Ro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. StaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WeakleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WeakleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006