Legal Opinion

Balaas v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff and a young lady by the name of Margaret A. Takeman were injured while they were respectively sliding and skiing in a public park under the control of the park commissioners of the defendant city. Both brought suit claiming that, under the circumstances, the city maintained a nuisance, and judgment was rendered for the defendant in each case. The plaintiffs appealed. The parties stipulated that the issues in the two suits were the same, that the record in the Balaas suit only should be printed and that the decision should control the result in the Takeman case.

The undisputed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KievmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Murphy v. OssolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. City of Cleveland v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Andrews v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Stowe v. MilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Kostyal v. CassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. DeLahunta v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Carabetta v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API