Legal Opinion

Sam Bloom Advertising Agency v. Brush

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1955No. 6826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

■ Plaintiff-appellant, Sam’ Bloom Advertising Agency, and appellee, Kenneth L. Brush, doing business as Rose City Nursery, entered into an oral agreement whereby appellant would conduct certain advertising on behalf of appellee’s rose nursery business. A portion of the charges made by appellant were paid by appellee. Suit was brought by appellant to recover $9,430.12 which appellant alleged to be the reasonable worth, of the services performed but not paid for. Certain jury findings (among others) were made to the effect that the reasonable value of appellant’s services (not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cathey v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stark v. BurkittTexas Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Southmore Savings AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sherwin-Williams Company v. Perry CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Hallmark Builders, Inc. v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Star Corporation v. General Screw Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API