Legal Opinion

Ormeno v. Pasha Automotive Services

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 12, 2020No. 3:19-cv-07258Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY ORMENO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07258-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PASHA AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant. The question in this case is whether employees at a cargo processing facility for automobiles at Pier 80 in San Francisco are protected by the City’s prevailing wage ordinance. The answer is yes. I Pasha Automotive Services is a cargo terminal operator that specializes in the shipment of automobiles. Pursuant to a contract with the City and County of San Francisco, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API