Legal Opinion

S.S. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 17, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01367Unknown

1Opinion

APR 17 2023 | 5 x 5 ro CAL □□ 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |; 5-S., a minor, by and through his Guardian ) Case No.: 3:21-cv-01367-BEN-DEB ad Litem Eunjin Stern; EUNJIN STERN, _ ) 12 || an individual; WILLIAM STERN, an ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 13 || individual,, ) MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT 4 Plaintiff. ) TESTIMONY ) 15 Vv. ) 16 || PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., a "7 Delaware corporation; DOES | through ) 50, inclusive, ) [ECF No. 65] 18 Defendant. ) 19 20 || 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff S.S., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API