Fees v. Williams
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants rendered by the trial court on the pleadings in an action to enjoin defendants from violating certain alleged building restrictions. Respondents failed to respond to an order to show cause and have not seen fit to file a brief herein.
The complainant alleges that on October 2'5, 1912, one Hattie B. Waite owned a certain described tract of real property; that on that date said Hattie B. Waite caused this tract to be subdivided into some forty lots, according to a recorded map; that pursuant to a purpose of creating uniform…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kent v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Anderson v. Pacific Avenue Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bessette v. GuarinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
- Fig Garden Park No. 1 Homeowners Ass'n v. Assemi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- King v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.