Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Weinberger

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 30, 1973No. Civ. 72-1312PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge:

This action challenges the constitutionality of the eligibility requirement for aliens who wish to enroll in the supplemental medical insurance plan established as part of the Medicare program. Section 1836(2)(A) (ii) of the Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, 42 U.S. C. § 1395o(2) (A) (ii) (1970), disqualifies all aliens from benefits but those lawfully admitted for permanent residence who have resided in the United States continuously for five years prior to making application for enrollment. 1

The supplemental medical insurance…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Noel v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Darces v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Silbowitz v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
  5. Anthony S. Kalina v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API