Anthony S. Kalina v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCREE, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review the Railroad Retirement Board’s decision that Anthony Kalina is not entitled to a spouse’s annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, 45 U.S.C. §§ 228a — 228z-l because he did not establish that he was receiving at least one-half of his support from his wife on the date that her annuity as a retired railroad worker began. Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of section 2(f) of the Act, 45 U.S.C. § 228b(f)(ii), which defines the term “spouse,” 1 but the Board refused to consider his contention, stating that “[qjuestions of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schlesinger v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Califano v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Tomarchio v. Township of GreenwichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Westcott v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- Denberg v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.