Legal Opinion

Anthony S. Kalina v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1976No. 75-2256PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review the Railroad Retirement Board’s decision that Anthony Kalina is not entitled to a spouse’s annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, 45 U.S.C. §§ 228a — 228z-l because he did not establish that he was receiving at least one-half of his support from his wife on the date that her annuity as a retired railroad worker began. Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of section 2(f) of the Act, 45 U.S.C. § 228b(f)(ii), which defines the term “spouse,” 1 but the Board refused to consider his contention, stating that “[qjuestions of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Schlesinger v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Califano v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Tomarchio v. Township of GreenwichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Westcott v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
  5. Denberg v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API