Bernstein v. Downs
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. George E. Otis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was brought to recover four hundred and thirty-two dollars and twenty-five *202cents for work and material furnished by plaintiff’s assignors in making improvements on the street and sidewalk in front of defendant’s lot. This sum of money was the amount originally fixed as a street assessment; but the assessment, on account of a certain irregularity became Void, and the action is founded upon defendant’s promise to pay the amount so assessed. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Appellant’s main contention for a reversal is that the complaint does not state facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Barron v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hunt v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Burrows v. StrykerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Tissot v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wales v. Pacific Electric Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Brownfield v. McFaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gelb v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.