Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Commissioner of Banks

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 20, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a suit in equity filed in this court August 15, 1934, to empower and direct the commissioner of banks, in possession and control of the Exchange Trust Company, to allow a set-off of money on deposit to the plaintiffs’ account against a sum due from the plaintiffs to the Exchange Trust Company, of which sum the plaintiffs desire to make payment in this manner. Certain facts were agreed before and at the hearing of the case, whereupon a final decree was ordered by a single justice dismissing the bill. From this decree the plaintiffs appealed.

It appears from the agreed facts that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Spaulding v. BackusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Perry v. PyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Bachrach v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Rossi Bros. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. In re the Liquidation of American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Commissioner of Insurance v. Munich American Reinsurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Cockey v. HospelhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API