Legal Opinion

People v. Don Carlos

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1941No. Crim. A. 1811PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced to five days’ imprisonment for driving a vehicle upon San Fernando Road, north of the Lankershim Boulevard intersection, at a rate of speed prohibited by the basic speed law. The basic speed law is set forth in section 510, Vehicle Code, in these words: “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” We have concluded that the evidence supports…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. People v. MendosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. City of CarlinvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Whitson v. City of FranklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Callahan v. William F.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. State v. DeRossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API