Legal Opinion

State v. DeRoss

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 8, 1969No. 1 CA-CR 158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

Appellant, found guilty of obstructing a public officer 1 while the officer was arresting appellant’s brother, challenges his conviction primarily on the basis of certain instructions to the jury. Our determination of appellant’s contentions requires us to consider the scope and applicability of the rule which gives one the right to aid another’s resistance to an unlawful arrest.

The important figures in the case are appellant, his younger brother, Francis, and Officers Bachman and LaBash of the Phoenix police force. The events leading up to the charge against appellant occurred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Bad Elk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HattonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. State v. TagesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. State v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API